Monday, June 18, 2012

Once I dealt with a client, a CEO of a major high-tech firm. He was 54 years old with a degree from MIT. He was also — like most of my clients — extremely action-oriented and impatient. Surveys indicated that his employees felt they didn’t understand the company’s mission and overall direction.

“I don’t get it,” he groaned. “I clearly articulated the mission and direction in our team meeting. I’ve summarized it in a memo, which was immediately distributed. See, here’s the memo! What more do they want?”


I thought he was kidding, that he had a very refined sense of irony. Making people understand the company’s mission doesn’t happen by chance. It also doesn’t happen overnight. Surely this smart CEO understood how difficult it was to communicate even a simple message. But by the pained expression on his face, I could see he was serious and (if only in this one area of management) clueless.

“Let’s review,” I said. “How was this memo distributed?”

“By email,” he replied. “It went to everyone.”

“Okay. How many people actually read the memo?”

“I’m not sure,” he said.

“Of those who read the email, how many do you think understood the message?”

He thought for a second and said, “I don’t know.”

“Of those who understood it, how many actually believed it was serious - not just PR hype?”

He shook his head.

“Of this dwindling group of believers, how many remembered it?”

Another sorry head shake.

“That’s a lot of unknowns for something you regard as vital to your company’s existence,” I said. “But that’s not the worst part. Once you eliminate all those people — and it’s quite possible there aren’t many people left — how many people do you think will change their behavior based upon the memo? How many will begin living and breathing the company’s mission because of your memo?”

The CEO just grimaced and shrugged his shoulders.

I tried to revive his spirits by pointing out that the deeper issue was his mistaken belief about communication, not this memo.

“The only thing you’re guilty of,” I said, “was that you checked the box. You thought your job was done when you articulated the mission and wrote the memo, just one more item on your to-do list. You moved on. Mentally, you smiled and said, ‘Next!’ ”

Leaders all too often believe that their organizations operate with strict down-the-chain-of-command efficiency. One of the great causes of corporate dysfunction is the glaring gap between “I say” and “they do.” It’s a huge mistake to assume that just because people understand, then they will do. Like most extremely busy leaders, this CEO wanted to believe that after he communicated direction, people heard him, understood him, believed him, and then executed. I can understand why executives persist in thinking this way. We all want to believe that our comments have great meaning. We usually assume that the people around us are smart, and they can understand what we’re saying and see the value of our remarks. We’re often busy and over committed. We all wish we could just move on to the next item on our list.

The good news for every manager, including my CEO friend, is that this false belief has a simple cure. It’s called “follow-up.” After communicating, follow up to make sure that people really understand, talk with them to get a read of their buy-in, and involve them to make sure that they’re committed to execution.

Follow-up may take a little time, but it’s less than the time wasted on miscommunication.  -   (from "You Spoke, But No One Listened" By Marshall Goldsmith and Kelly Goldsmith)
The single biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place. - George Bernard Shaw

Thursday, June 14, 2012

Eyes on the prize!

A lion was taken into captivity and thrown into a concentration camp where, to his amazement, he found other lions who had been there for years, some of them all their lives, for they had been born there.

He soon became acquainted with the social activities of the camp. They banded themselves into groups. One group consisted of the socializers; another was into show-business; yet another was cultural for its purpose was carefully preserve the customs, the tradition and the history of the times when lions were free; other groups were religious, they gathered mostly to sing moving songs about a future jungle where they would be no fences; some groups attracted those who were literary and artistic by nature; some just turned critic/complainant  blaming circumstances or other lions for doing nothing to end their miseries; some groups just lamented their inability, lack of courage for failing to do anything about it and cursed their fate; while some just aligned with the captors by serving their interests to have easy captive life; others still were revolutionary, they met to plot against their captors or against other revolutionary groups to head the revolution campaign.


Every now and then a revolution would break out, one particular group would be wiped out by another, or the guards would all be killed and replaced by another set of guards by camp owners. All this did no good but to have a tougher captive life as more miseries were then thrown at them by merciless guards and camp owners.

As he looked around, the newcomer observed one lion who always seemed deep in thought, a loner who belonged to no group and mostly kept away from everyone. There was something strange about him that commanded everyone's admiration and everyone's hostility for his presence aroused fear and self-doubt.

He said to the new comer, "Join no group. These poor fools are busy with everything except what is essential."

"And what is that?" asked the newcomer.

"Studying the nature of the fence."